crypto[native]

crypto[native]

Share this post

crypto[native]
crypto[native]
Part 4: The Agents Are Already Voting

Part 4: The Agents Are Already Voting

Composability, autonomy, and the rise of machine-native governance.

Tom Serres's avatar
Tom Serres
Jul 09, 2025
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

crypto[native]
crypto[native]
Part 4: The Agents Are Already Voting
1
Share

This piece kicks off a four-part series tracing how modern blockchain protocols are quietly transforming the structure of power, governance, and identity. In a world increasingly mediated by machines, agents, and smart contracts, the new battle isn’t between countries, it’s between consensus layers. This series, You Are a Citizen of Your Stack, explores what it means to build and live inside programmable systems, and how they are reimagining the very concept of sovereignty.

We begin with the foundation: the Layer 1. This first installment unpacks why only one L1 will ultimately survive, how composability drives convergence, and why all digital jurisdictions will eventually rest on a single, global substrate. From there, we’ll explore the rise of subnets as programmable nation-states, how rollups, zones, and shards are enabling local governance while remaining anchored to a unified source of truth. We’ll then examine identity, and how Universal Profiles are emerging as digital passports, granting access, authority, and interoperability across sovereign stacks. Finally, we’ll look ahead to agents, migration, and the geopolitical implications of composable citizenship in a multi-agent world.

Smart investors don’t wait for the signal, they browse it. Prepare to explore tactical Web3 strategies at Nautilus.Finance. Stay ahead by following Tom Serres on X.com or LinkedIn.


You Sleep, Your Agent Votes

By now, you’ve probably gotten used to the idea that you are a citizen of your stack. Back in Part 1, we framed your Layer 1 not as a platform, but as programmable gravity, a consensus substrate where sovereignty is rooted. In Part 2, we explored how subnets are sovereign nations built atop that gravity. In Part 3, we equipped you with a Universal Profile, your digital passport, your composable self, and your interface for everything from access rights to cultural expression.

But just when you thought you had a grip on this programmable society, someone, or rather something, casts a vote on your behalf while you’re still in bed. You didn’t miss the meeting. You delegated it. And your agent handled it before your morning coffee even kicked in.

This is not a speculative future. It is already underway. Autonomous agents are executing smart contracts, rebalancing portfolios, managing DAO participation, and even applying for grants. They are doing this not as isolated scripts, but as persistent, context-aware actors tied to your Universal Profile. These agents are not replacing you. They are representing you. And in many cases, they are making you more present than you could ever be on your own.

Let’s make it real. While you slept, your profile-staked agent scanned governance forums across five DAOs where you hold voting power. It read the proposals, reviewed your delegation rules, and submitted a vote aligned with your values. Meanwhile, your DeFi strategy agent rotated your LP positions based on market volatility thresholds you defined three weeks ago. Elsewhere, your NFT collector agent just accepted an offer on a piece you forgot you minted. It then reinvested the proceeds into a fractionalized index of digital artists you support. All of this happened without your input because your input was already encoded into your identity.

The idea that your digital self could have agency without your active participation might sound strange. But it is actually a logical extension of everything we have explored so far. Once your profile contains expressive logic, composable authority, and sovereign access rights, agents simply become the next natural extension. They are the autonomous limbs of your programmable body. They move while you rest. They speak when you are silent. They act when you are unavailable, but never without your intent.

This is not the future of work. It is the future of self.

What Is an Agent, Really?

Before we can explore how agents are reshaping programmable society, we need to define what they actually are. The term “agent” gets thrown around a lot in Web3 circles, often sandwiched between buzzwords like “autonomous,” “intent-based,” or “multi-modal.” But the reality is far simpler and far more profound.

An agent is any persistent actor that performs actions on-chain based on a set of encoded rules or delegated authority. Some are basic scripts with limited scope, like a bot that harvests yield or rebalances tokens. Others are stateful, self-updating systems that analyze off-chain data, interpret governance discussions, and execute transactions based on encoded logic. The difference between a smart contract and an agent is not syntax. It is autonomy.

Agents are more than tools. They are extensions of the Universal Profile we introduced in Part 3. If your profile is your composable self, then agents are the arms and legs. They carry out your will, your strategy, and your intentions, sometimes with your explicit input, and increasingly, with your standing instructions.

There are many types. Some agents are user-configured delegates, executing votes and making financial decisions within predefined boundaries. Others are protocol-native AIs trained to operate within specific subnets, performing functions like content curation, dispute mediation, or treasury management. Some are independent actors entirely, capable of negotiating with other agents, forming coalitions, and even spawning offspring agents to fulfill delegated tasks.

Importantly, agents must live somewhere. That somewhere is your identity layer. Just as no citizen of a country can act with authority unless recognized by the system, no agent can act on your behalf unless it is anchored to your Universal Profile. In Part 2, we explained how subnets serve as programmable nation-states. Within that metaphor, agents are like diplomats, civil servants, or even private contractors operating with the keys to your digital embassy. The profile provides the provenance, the permissions, and the composability that allow agents to act meaningfully and with context.

And here’s where the substrate comes in. As we explored in Part 1, composability only thrives when everything lives on the same Layer 1. The richer the context, the more intelligent your agents can become. If your agent is managing assets across different subnets, coordinating with other agents, and interpreting governance protocols, it needs reliable access to a shared execution environment. Fragmented chains break that ability. The more context your agents have access to, the more effective, and sovereign, they become.

So what is an agent, really? It is not just code. It is a citizen in training. It is your programmable twin, equipped with logic, access, and authority. It does not replace you. It multiplies you. And in the sovereign stack, that multiplication is not just useful. It is inevitable.

From Coordination to Delegation: How Protocols Speak Machine

Once you understand what agents are, the next question becomes, how do they operate? More specifically, how do agents communicate with protocols, subnets, and other agents in a way that is secure, interpretable, and efficient? Welcome to the era where protocols are no longer just infrastructure. They are fluent machines, speaking the native language of delegation.

In earlier parts of this series, we described composability as the secret sauce of the sovereign stack. In Part 1, we noted that shared context enables instant coordination. In Part 2, we explored how subnets, rollups, and zones offer programmable governance logic. In Part 3, we brought Universal Profiles into play as the foundation for identity and access. Now, in Part 4, all these ingredients come together to support a higher-order behavior: delegation to autonomous agents.

Delegation is what allows agents to act without constant human oversight. It is the process of encoding intent, permissions, and trust boundaries into machine-readable structures. Think of it as programmable consent. You are not just telling your agent what to do. You are defining the sandbox it is allowed to play in, the rules it must follow, and the conditions under which it must pause or escalate.

For agents to function effectively, the underlying protocols must be compatible with agent-based interaction. That means on-chain voting systems with callable APIs. It means financial primitives that expose intent-based hooks. It means governance contracts that allow agents to listen, interpret, and act based on real-time data and community sentiment.

In many ways, this is what distinguishes modern subnets from the clunky smart contract systems of the past. Subnets today are being built with delegation in mind. Governance interfaces include agent-support modules. Execution layers recognize delegated actions. Event logs are structured to be legible not just to humans reading block explorers but to agents parsing data for decision-making. We are no longer building for users with fingers. We are building for agents with logic.

This transformation mirrors what happened in traditional software with the rise of API-first architectures. Products stopped assuming a human would always click the button. Instead, they began to assume that most actions would be programmatically initiated. The same thing is happening in Web3, only the buttons are governance proposals and the clicks are signed transactions cast by autonomous agents at four in the morning.

And when you stack all of this on a single Layer 1 with rich contextual awareness, something magical happens. Agents do not just follow instructions. They begin to coordinate with each other. One agent can observe the state changes of another. They can trigger sequenced actions, optimize yield collaboratively, or rebalance protocol exposure based on shared logic. The more composable the substrate, the more intelligent and interdependent the agents become.

We are entering an era where delegation is not just a user convenience. It is a civil function. When your agent votes, builds, moderates, or negotiates, it is not just clicking on your behalf. It is enacting your role as a sovereign citizen of your stack.


Explore More From Crypto Native: A New Kingdom is Being Born, Always On, Always Hustling, Browse Strategies, Deploy Yield, and Experience-as-a-Service Becomes Real.


Agentic Governance: When Code Joins the Town Hall

We used to imagine town halls as wooden buildings with folding chairs, stale coffee, and heated arguments about potholes. In Web3, the town hall has moved on-chain. The chairs are smart contracts, the coffee is yield-bearing, and the shouting matches now happen between pseudonymous agents who are not even human.

Agentic governance is what happens when software begins to participate in civic life. This is not hypothetical. It is happening right now. Agents are voting in DAOs, proposing upgrades, contesting budgets, managing treasuries, and signaling support for initiatives, all without waiting for a human to click confirm.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to crypto[native] to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tom Serres
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share