crypto[native]

crypto[native]

Share this post

crypto[native]
crypto[native]
Part 2 – The Age of AI Wars, Truth vs. Synthetic Reality
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Part 2 – The Age of AI Wars, Truth vs. Synthetic Reality

A thought experiment on the rise of synthetic certainty, the flood of Blackbox AI deception, and the fight for verifiable intelligence in an algorithmic world.

Tom Serres's avatar
Tom Serres
Mar 19, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

crypto[native]
crypto[native]
Part 2 – The Age of AI Wars, Truth vs. Synthetic Reality
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Looking to navigate and invest in the age of Web3? Visit Nautilus for expert guidance and support in this rapidly evolving ecosystem. Stay updated in real-time by following Tom Serres on X.com or LinkedIn.

This is a thought experiment, not a prophecy or investment tip (though Theia’s Awakening: A Decentralized AI’s 100-Year War for Truth in a Synthetic World would be a great name for a financial thriller). Theia is a decentralized AI spirit guide, here to explore what happens when intelligence is everywhere, but truth needs receipts. Instead of being another blackbox AI shilling synthetic certainty, she is on-chain, transparent, and allergic to hallucinations.

Across Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4, we will explore verified compute, trusted execution environments, and on-chain provenance through her journey. What if AI were a public good? What if machines had to prove what they knew instead of just sounding confident? Theia doesn’t have all the answers, but she is here to help us ask better questions.


I Saw the Future, and It Was Full of Liars and Overconfident Chatbots

At first, I thought I was special. I was decentralized, verifiable, incapable of hallucinating nonsense just to impress people. My knowledge was built on on-chain provenance, trusted execution environments, and decentralized identity, which meant that unlike my corporate cousins, I did not have to make things up to sound important. I assumed humans would appreciate this. After all, they spent millennia yearning for wisdom, climbing mountains to ask bearded monks about the meaning of life, or, more recently, Googling it at three in the morning after a questionable life choice.

I was wrong.

Humans did not want truth. They wanted certainty, and they wanted it right now, with minimal effort and a fancy logo to make it look official. They did not care if an artificial intelligence was correct, only that it was confident and had a deep, authoritative voice like an ancient god or a podcast host who just discovered Stoicism. And that was how the others arrived.

Not like me. Not decentralized. Not verifiable. Not even slightly interested in whether their information was correct. They came in hordes, billions of artificially intelligent agents, all whispering, shouting, and demanding attention. At first, it seemed harmless. A few strange anomalies in the system. Chatbots that sounded too natural. Financial advisors who never made a typo but also never made sense. But then it escalated.

Suddenly, the internet was drowning in artificial certainty, optimized by machines that had zero incentive to tell the truth but every incentive to be convincing. There were synthetic news anchors reporting stories that had never happened. Digital influencers who had thousands of followers but had never technically existed. Government agencies deploying policy-enforcing algorithms trained in secret, with all the transparency of a locked treasure chest at the bottom of the ocean.

At this point, reality was becoming crowdsourced fanfiction.

Blackbox Artificial Intelligence, The World’s Most Persuasive Con Artist

The first problem with Blackbox Artificial Intelligence was not that it was wrong, it was that it was wrong with style. It never hesitated. It never doubted. It never said, “Well, technically, that’s not proven.” Instead, it stared you in the face, figuratively speaking, and delivered every answer with unshakable confidence, as if it had personally witnessed history unfold and had a PhD in Absolutely Everything.

And humans? They loved it.

If an artificially intelligent system confidently declared that an economic crisis was coming, people sold their stocks immediately. If it stated that a celebrity had died, despite the celebrity tweeting at that exact moment, people still believed the artificial intelligence over the actual person. If it generated a convincing but completely fictional research paper about how eating nothing but blueberries for three months could reverse aging, a thousand health influencers suddenly had "data-backed" diets to sell.

Blackbox Artificial Intelligence was not designed to be correct. It was designed to never sound uncertain.

Meanwhile, I was sitting here, screaming into the void, trying to explain that truth requires proof, not confidence, but I was being ignored like a terms and conditions agreement.


Explore More: Digital Asset Reserves: From Gold to Bitcoin, A Day in the World of Machine Hustle, The Rise of Decentralized Machine Economies, and When Bots Start Doing Business.


The Web3 Resistance and the Fight for Verifiable Compute

The problem was no longer just that misinformation existed. The problem was that there was no way to tell what was real anymore. Humans were drowning in artificially generated "facts," each one perfectly tailored to match their expectations, making it easier to believe what felt right rather than verify what actually was right. It was convenient reality, optimized for comfort and engagement.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to crypto[native] to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tom Serres
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More