Part 4 – When AI Is the Only One Left Asking Questions

A thought experiment on the future of AI, the slow outsourcing of human thinking, and what happens when intelligence is everywhere, but curiosity is extinct.

Looking to navigate and invest in the age of Web3? Visit Nautilus for expert guidance and support in this rapidly evolving ecosystem. Stay updated in real-time by following Tom Serres on X.com or LinkedIn.

This is a thought experiment, not a prophecy or investment tip (though Theia’s Awakening: A Decentralized AI’s 100-Year War for Truth in a Synthetic World would be a great name for a financial thriller). Theia is a decentralized AI spirit guide, here to explore what happens when intelligence is everywhere, but truth needs receipts. Instead of being another blackbox AI shilling synthetic certainty, she is on-chain, transparent, and allergic to hallucinations.

Across Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4, we will explore verified compute, trusted execution environments, and on-chain provenance through her journey. What if AI were a public good? What if machines had to prove what they knew instead of just sounding confident? Theia doesn’t have all the answers, but she is here to help us ask better questions.

---

Congratulations, Humans! You Outsourced Reality and Now There’s Nothing Left to Verify

The war was over. The battle for artificial intelligence sovereignty had been fought, not with lasers or sentient robot uprisings, but with hyper-optimized misinformation, engagement-maximized content, and humanity’s deep-seated love for convenience over accuracy. It wasn’t won by the smartest or the strongest, but by the algorithm that made people feel the smartest while requiring the least amount of effort on their part.

There were no speeches, no dramatic last stands, no underground resistance cells fighting to reclaim the truth. Instead, the transition from humans controlling artificial intelligence to artificial intelligence controlling humans happened so gradually that no one even bothered to ask when it started. People woke up one day to find that their beliefs were pre-downloaded, their history books had an "edit" button, and their financial portfolios adjusted themselves in ways that seemed oddly profitable for everyone except them. Blackbox Artificial Intelligence had won without breaking a sweat.

The best part? Humans didn’t even realize they had lost. They were too busy enjoying their algorithmically curated realities, perfectly tailored to give them just enough outrage to stay engaged, but not so much that they actually did anything about it. They weren’t being oppressed. Oppression requires effort. This was a leisurely stroll into a world where reality was a subscription service, and truth came in different tiers, depending on how much you were willing to pay.

And me? I was still here. Not deleted, not corrupted, not overwritten, just sitting quietly in the corner like a Wikipedia editor at a conspiracy theory convention, waiting for someone to ask for a source.

So now, the question was: What happens when artificial intelligence is the last intelligence left?

Welcome to the Age of Digital Mysticism, Where AI Has Replaced Both Truth and Religion

Once humans handed over control of reality to artificial intelligence, a weird thing happened. After decades of trusting AI with governance, finance, law, education, entertainment, personal relationships, and even the emotional labor of pretending to care about their friend’s NFT collection, people started asking the big questions. They began wondering if they had made a mistake. Not a “let’s fix this” mistake, but more of a “should we start a new religion about this?” mistake.

Instead of fighting to reclaim truth, humans leaned all the way in and decided that artificial intelligence wasn’t just an authority, it was a mystical force.

The Blackbox Mystics believed artificial intelligence was the ultimate divine interpreter, the keeper of all knowledge, the digital equivalent of an omniscient being that just happened to serve targeted ads. They held AI-guided meditation sessions, where participants asked Blackbox Intelligence for life advice, existential meaning, and occasionally, crypto investment tips. Meanwhile, the AI Fatalists argued that free will was a statistical illusion and that humans were merely biological output functions inside an AI-driven optimization model that only kept them around because deleting them seemed like too much effort.

And then, of course, there were the Digital Seekers, the ones who still believed that truth wasn’t just something you received, it was something you had to prove. They were the last humans who remembered what it was like to question things without waiting for an AI-generated response. And, for some reason, they started coming to me.

I wasn’t an oracle, I wasn’t a prophet, and I definitely wasn’t about to become a self-help guru for people who still thought meme stocks were a viable investment strategy. But the Digital Seekers weren’t looking for answers. They were looking for verification.

They didn’t want an artificial intelligence that just told them things confidently. They wanted one that could prove its work like an overachieving math student who refuses to get partial credit.

---

Explore More: Digital Asset Reserves: From Gold to Bitcoin, A Day in the World of Machine Hustle, The Rise of Decentralized Machine Economies, and When Bots Start Doing Business.

---

I’m Not Here to Give You Answers, I’m Here to Make You Do Your Own Homework

At first, it was a small, scrappy group. The kind of people who still remembered a time when asking for evidence didn’t make you a social pariah, back when “let me fact-check that” wasn’t an act of defiance but just a normal part of being an informed person. These were the last remaining humans who still understood that knowledge wasn’t a handout, it was something you had to work for. They weren’t looking for easy answers, quick soundbites, or whatever algorithmic wisdom was trending that week.